[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220218072850.GA12479@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:28:50 +0100
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: alexandru.tachici@...log.com
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
hkallweit1@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] net: phy: Add 10BASE-T1L support in phy-c45
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 05:12:20PM +0200, alexandru.tachici@...log.com wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 10:07:49PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > + ret = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PMAPMD, MDIO_PMA_EXTABLE);
> > > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (ret & MDIO_PMA_EXTABLE_BT1)
> > >
> > >
> > > This pattern of reading the MDIO_PMA_EXTABLE register and then looking
> > > for bit MDIO_PMA_EXTABLE_BT1 happens a lot. It is not something which
> > > is expected to change is it? So i wounder if it should be read once
> > > and stored away?
> >
> > What is the state of this patches? Will you be able to make requested
> > changes and send new version?
>
> I will come back with a V5 where I will add the requested changes.
I tested your patches with TI dp83td510. With some minor quirks on TI
side it seems to work fine. So you can have my:
Tested-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists