lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 20 Feb 2022 11:05:14 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <>
To:     Pavel Machek <>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <>,,, Guo Ren <>,
        Anup Patel <>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <>,
        Samuel Holland <>,
        Thomas Gleixner <>,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 03/11] irqchip/sifive-plic: Add missing
 thead,c900-plic match string

On 2022-02-20 09:54, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>> [ Upstream commit 1d4df649cbb4b26d19bea38ecff4b65b10a1bbca ]
>> The thead,c900-plic has been used in opensbi to distinguish
>> PLIC [1]. Although PLICs have the same behaviors in Linux,
>> they are different hardware with some custom initializing in
>> firmware(opensbi).
>> Qute opensbi patch commit-msg by Samuel:
>>   The T-HEAD PLIC implementation requires setting a delegation bit
>>   to allow access from S-mode. Now that the T-HEAD PLIC has its own
>>   compatible string, set this bit automatically from the PLIC driver,
>>   instead of reaching into the PLIC's MMIO space from another driver.
>> [1]: 
> The "thead,c900-plic" string is added into single place in the
> kernel. This means that a) it will probably not do anything useful in
> -stable kernels and b) it is certainly missing documentation etc.
> In mainline, string is documented in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml

(b) is certainly true. And to make the above comment useful, the missing
patch is 321a8be37e1a ("dt-bindings: update riscv plic compatible

Regarding (a), the DT is provided by the firmware (as it should
be on any reasonable platform). As such, no need for this string to be
mentioned anywhere else but in the documentation.

Now, the real question is where there is any point in backporting
this to such an old kernel, as this HW is unlikely to ever run it.

Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists