lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 20 Feb 2022 06:12:09 +0530
From:   Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
To:     Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: Initialize ret to 0 inside btf_populate_kfunc_set()

On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 10:09:15PM IST, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> From: "Souptick Joarder (HPE)" <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
>
> Kernel test robot reported below error ->
>
> kernel/bpf/btf.c:6718 btf_populate_kfunc_set()
> error: uninitialized symbol 'ret'.
>
> Initialize ret to 0.
>
> Fixes: 	dee872e124e8 ("bpf: Populate kfunc BTF ID sets in struct btf")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder (HPE) <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
> ---

Thanks for the fix.

Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>

>  kernel/bpf/btf.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index 02d7014417a0..2c4c5dbe2abe 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -6706,7 +6706,7 @@ static int btf_populate_kfunc_set(struct btf *btf, enum btf_kfunc_hook hook,
>  				  const struct btf_kfunc_id_set *kset)
>  {
>  	bool vmlinux_set = !btf_is_module(btf);
> -	int type, ret;
> +	int type, ret = 0;
>
>  	for (type = 0; type < ARRAY_SIZE(kset->sets); type++) {
>  		if (!kset->sets[type])
> --
> 2.25.1
>

--
Kartikeya

Powered by blists - more mailing lists