[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XjWzyQ5mQ1cPK5qg6xZhXoBkomsuAgTWJRryxMR_wVcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:48:01 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Knox Chiou <knoxchiou@...omium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmem: qfprom: Increase fuse blow timeout to prevent
write fail.
Srinivas
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 6:57 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 6:31 PM Knox Chiou <knoxchiou@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > sc7180 blow fuses got slightly chances to hit qfprom_reg_write timeout.
> > Current timeout is simply too low. Since blowing fuses is a
> > very rare operation, so the risk associated with overestimating this
> > number is low.
> > Increase fuse blow timeout from 1ms to 10ms.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Knox Chiou <knoxchiou@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Slight nit that ${SUBJECT} for patches usually doesn't end with a
> period. Presumably if Srinivas cares he can fix it while applying.
>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
I noticed that this patch still isn't in linux-next. Did it get lost,
or are you waiting for anything additional before applying?
Thanks!
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists