[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YhUxHNRxxepEmc8j@lakrids>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 18:53:16 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, maz@...nel.org, qperret@...gle.com,
tabba@...gle.com, surenb@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Andrew Walbran <qwandor@...gle.com>,
Andrew Scull <ascull@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] KVM: arm64: Introduce hyp_alloc_private_va_range()
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 08:51:02AM -0800, Kalesh Singh wrote:
> hyp_alloc_private_va_range() can be used to reserve private VA ranges
> in the nVHE hypervisor. Also update __create_hyp_private_mapping()
> to allow specifying an alignment for the private VA mapping.
>
> These will be used to implement stack guard pages for KVM nVHE hypervisor
> (nVHE Hyp mode / not pKVM), in a subsequent patch in the series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 4 +++
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> index 81839e9a8a24..0b0c71302b92 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> @@ -153,6 +153,10 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long __kern_hyp_va(unsigned long v)
> int kvm_share_hyp(void *from, void *to);
> void kvm_unshare_hyp(void *from, void *to);
> int create_hyp_mappings(void *from, void *to, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
> +unsigned long hyp_alloc_private_va_range(size_t size, size_t align);
> +int __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> + size_t align, unsigned long *haddr,
> + enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
> int create_hyp_io_mappings(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> void __iomem **kaddr,
> void __iomem **haddr);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index bc2aba953299..e5abcce44ad0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -457,22 +457,16 @@ int create_hyp_mappings(void *from, void *to, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> - unsigned long *haddr,
> - enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
> +
> +/*
> + * Allocates a private VA range below io_map_base.
> + *
> + * @size: The size of the VA range to reserve.
> + * @align: The required alignment for the allocation.
> + */
> +unsigned long hyp_alloc_private_va_range(size_t size, size_t align)
> {
> unsigned long base;
> - int ret = 0;
> -
> - if (!kvm_host_owns_hyp_mappings()) {
> - base = kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_create_private_mapping,
> - phys_addr, size, prot);
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL((void *)base))
> - return PTR_ERR((void *)base);
There is a latent bug here; PTR_ERR() is not valid for NULL.
Today on arm64 that will happen to return 0, which may or may not be
what you want, but it's a bad pattern regardless.
That applies to the two copies below that this has been transformed
into.
Thanks,
Mark
> - *haddr = base;
> -
> - return 0;
> - }
>
> mutex_lock(&kvm_hyp_pgd_mutex);
>
> @@ -484,8 +478,8 @@ static int __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> *
> * The allocated size is always a multiple of PAGE_SIZE.
> */
> - size = PAGE_ALIGN(size + offset_in_page(phys_addr));
> - base = io_map_base - size;
> + base = io_map_base - PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> + base = ALIGN_DOWN(base, align);
>
> /*
> * Verify that BIT(VA_BITS - 1) hasn't been flipped by
> @@ -493,20 +487,45 @@ static int __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> * overflowed the idmap/IO address range.
> */
> if ((base ^ io_map_base) & BIT(VA_BITS - 1))
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> + base = (unsigned long)ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> else
> io_map_base = base;
>
> mutex_unlock(&kvm_hyp_pgd_mutex);
>
> + return base;
> +}
> +
> +int __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> + size_t align, unsigned long *haddr,
> + enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
> +{
> + unsigned long addr;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (!kvm_host_owns_hyp_mappings()) {
> + addr = kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_create_private_mapping,
> + phys_addr, size, prot);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL((void *)addr))
> + return PTR_ERR((void *)addr);
> + *haddr = addr;
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + size += offset_in_page(phys_addr);
> + addr = hyp_alloc_private_va_range(size, align);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL((void *)addr))
> + return PTR_ERR((void *)addr);
> +
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> - ret = __create_hyp_mappings(base, size, phys_addr, prot);
> + ret = __create_hyp_mappings(addr, size, phys_addr, prot);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> - *haddr = base + offset_in_page(phys_addr);
> + *haddr = addr + offset_in_page(phys_addr);
> out:
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -537,7 +556,7 @@ int create_hyp_io_mappings(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> return 0;
> }
>
> - ret = __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr, size,
> + ret = __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr, size, PAGE_SIZE,
> &addr, PAGE_HYP_DEVICE);
> if (ret) {
> iounmap(*kaddr);
> @@ -564,7 +583,7 @@ int create_hyp_exec_mappings(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
>
> BUG_ON(is_kernel_in_hyp_mode());
>
> - ret = __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr, size,
> + ret = __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr, size, PAGE_SIZE,
> &addr, PAGE_HYP_EXEC);
> if (ret) {
> *haddr = NULL;
> --
> 2.35.1.473.g83b2b277ed-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists