[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01ba8559-b6f9-cc75-2080-7308a04ce262@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:33:35 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix function address when kvm_x86_ops.func is
NULL
On 2/22/22 07:25, Like Xu wrote:
> From: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
>
> Fix the function address for __static_call_return0() which is used by
> static_call_update() when a func in struct kvm_x86_ops is NULL.
>
> Fixes: 5be2226f417d ("KVM: x86: allow defining return-0 static calls")
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
Sorry for the stupid question, but what breaks?
Paolo
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 713e08f62385..312f5ee19514 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1548,7 +1548,7 @@ static inline void kvm_ops_static_call_update(void)
> #define KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL __KVM_X86_OP
> #define KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0(func) \
> static_call_update(kvm_x86_##func, kvm_x86_ops.func ? : \
> - (void *) __static_call_return0);
> + (void *)&__static_call_return0);
> #include <asm/kvm-x86-ops.h>
> #undef __KVM_X86_OP
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists