[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb9e8765-33d8-5696-37bc-98e33c93f0c2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 16:54:54 +0800
From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix function address when kvm_x86_ops.func is
NULL
On 22/2/2022 4:33 pm, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 2/22/22 07:25, Like Xu wrote:
>> From: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
>>
>> Fix the function address for __static_call_return0() which is used by
>> static_call_update() when a func in struct kvm_x86_ops is NULL.
>>
>> Fixes: 5be2226f417d ("KVM: x86: allow defining return-0 static calls")
>> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
>
> Sorry for the stupid question, but what breaks?
Although they are numerically the same, I suppose we should use the
& operator here, as in the other cases where __static_call_return0 is used.
What's more, Clang complains about the KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0 change:
./arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h:108:1: warning: pointer type mismatch \
('bool (*)(struct kvm_vcpu *)' (aka '_Bool (*)(struct kvm_vcpu *)') and 'void *') \
[-Wpointer-type-mismatch]
and more warnings from [-Wpointer-type-mismatch]
Does it help you ?
>
> Paolo
>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 713e08f62385..312f5ee19514 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -1548,7 +1548,7 @@ static inline void kvm_ops_static_call_update(void)
>> #define KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL __KVM_X86_OP
>> #define KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0(func) \
>> static_call_update(kvm_x86_##func, kvm_x86_ops.func ? : \
>> - (void *) __static_call_return0);
>> + (void *)&__static_call_return0);
>> #include <asm/kvm-x86-ops.h>
>> #undef __KVM_X86_OP
>> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists