[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJq09z6dK20UDCM1P09A4KVGqjrHwPy0GTH3ogA27x7PTMtxtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 21:08:05 -0300
From: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: net: dsa: add new mdio property
> Your threading of these two patches is broken. The usual way to do this is
>
> git format-patch HEAD~2
> git send-email *.patch
>
> You will then get uniform subject lines and the two emails threaded
> together.
Thanks, Andrew, I did something like that. However, bindings and
net-next have different requirements. One needs the mail to go to
devicetree@...r.kernel.org and the other a different prefix. So, I
used send-email twice. Or should I use net-next for both and send both
also to devicetree@? I did forget to set the "In-Reply-To:" in the
second message.
Luiz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists