[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YhSWFl/dQaGA9V70@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:51:50 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: net: dsa: add new mdio property
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 09:08:05PM -0300, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote:
> > Your threading of these two patches is broken. The usual way to do this is
> >
> > git format-patch HEAD~2
> > git send-email *.patch
> >
> > You will then get uniform subject lines and the two emails threaded
> > together.
>
> Thanks, Andrew, I did something like that. However, bindings and
> net-next have different requirements. One needs the mail to go to
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org and the other a different prefix. So, I
> used send-email twice. Or should I use net-next for both and send both
> also to devicetree@? I did forget to set the "In-Reply-To:" in the
> second message.
Binding need to be cc: to device tree, however they are generally
merged by some other subsystem, where ever the driver belongs. Rob
will review the binding, give his reviewed-by: and then Jakub or David
will merge both to net-next.
You can send both to device tree, or you can add a Cc: line to the
binding patch, before your own signed-off. git send-email will see it
and extend the list of recipients with whatever email address you put
there.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists