[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9262a630-1f3e-0f58-110d-abfebe8274af@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 12:08:40 -0500
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: serge@...lyn.com, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
containers@...ts.linux.dev, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, krzysztof.struczynski@...wei.com,
roberto.sassu@...wei.com, mpeters@...hat.com, lhinds@...hat.com,
lsturman@...hat.com, puiterwi@...hat.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
jamjoom@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paul@...l-moore.com, rgb@...hat.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 24/27] ima: Introduce securityfs file to activate an
IMA namespace
On 2/23/22 08:54, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-02-01 at 15:37 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>> int ima_fs_ns_init(struct user_namespace *user_ns, struct dentry *root)
>> {
>> struct ima_namespace *ns = ima_ns_from_user_ns(user_ns);
>> @@ -531,6 +596,12 @@ int ima_fs_ns_init(struct user_namespace *user_ns, struct dentry *root)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + if (ns != &init_ima_ns) {
>> + ret = ima_fs_add_ns_files(ima_dir);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
> In all other cases, the securityfs files are directly created in
> ima_fs_ns_init(). What is different about "active" that a new
> function is defined?
It was meant as a function to create namespace-specific files, if more
were to come along. I can move the code from ima_fs_add_ns_files() into
this function if you want.
>
> thanks,
>
> Mimi
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists