[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <420C3057-8359-4303-9E25-0C25FAB9203B@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 23:26:57 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"Poimboe, Josh" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"hjl.tools@...il.com" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"joao@...rdrivepizza.com" <joao@...rdrivepizza.com>,
"Cooper, Andrew" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"samitolvanen@...gle.com" <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
"ndesaulniers@...gle.com" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
"Milburn, Alyssa" <alyssa.milburn@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/29] x86: Kernel IBT
On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 17:49 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This is an (almost!) complete Kernel IBT implementation.
BTW, I've successfully tested this on what /proc/cpuinfo calls an "11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1165G7 @ 2.80GHz" (in a Lenovo "Yoga 7 15ITL5"). Normal laptop-y things all seem happy and it correctly blows up on a new LKDTM test I'll send out tomorrow.
So, even though the series is young and has some TODOs still:
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
One thought: should there be a note in dmesg about it being active? The only way to see it is finding "ibt" in cpuinfo...
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists