linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] dt-bindings: clock: Add bindings for SP7021 clock driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <498e89dd-c438-68dc-69b5-8de82045ffbd@canonical.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Feb 2022 12:34:55 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Qin Jian <qinjian@...lus1.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        maz@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        broonie@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, stefan.wahren@...e.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        wells.lu@...plus.com, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] dt-bindings: clock: Add bindings for SP7021
 clock driver

On 21/02/2022 04:29, Qin Jian wrote:
> Add documentation to describe Sunplus SP7021 clock driver bindings.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Qin Jian <qinjian@...lus1.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/clock/sunplus,sp7021-clkc.yaml   |  52 ++++++++
>  MAINTAINERS                                   |   2 +
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/sp-sp7021.h         | 112 ++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunplus,sp7021-clkc.yaml
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/sp-sp7021.h
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunplus,sp7021-clkc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunplus,sp7021-clkc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..e6d098cf4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunplus,sp7021-clkc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +# Copyright (C) Sunplus Co., Ltd. 2021
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/sunplus,sp7021-clkc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Sunplus SP7021 SoC Clock Controller Binding
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Qin Jian <qinjian@...lus1.com>
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: sunplus,sp7021-clkc
> +
> +  "#clock-cells":
> +    const: 1
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    items:
> +      - description: External oscillator clock
> +      - description: System clock
> +
> +  clock-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: extclk
> +      - const: pllsys
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - "#clock-cells"
> +  - reg
> +  - clocks
> +  - clock-names
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    clkc: clock-controller@...00000 {
> +      compatible = "sunplus,sp7021-clkc";
> +      #clock-cells = <1>;
> +      reg = <0x9c000000 0x280>;
> +      clocks = <&extclk>, <&clkc PLL_SYS>;

Except the warning pointed out by Rob's bot, it looks like you feed this
clock-controller with a clock from itself. Is there a point to express
it in DTS at all?

> +      clock-names = "extclk", "pllsys";
> +    };

Best regards,
Krzysztof