[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YhZFITXtiL8Xaord@T590>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 22:30:57 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] blk-mq: fix potential uaf for 'queue_hw_ctx'
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 07:26:01PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs() will free the 'queue_hw_ctx'(e.g. undate
> submit_queues through configfs for null_blk), while it might still be
> used from other context(e.g. switch elevator to none):
>
> t1 t2
> elevator_switch
> blk_mq_unquiesce_queue
> blk_mq_run_hw_queues
> queue_for_each_hw_ctx
> // assembly code for hctx = (q)->queue_hw_ctx[i]
> mov 0x48(%rbp),%rdx -> read old queue_hw_ctx
>
> __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues
> blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs
> hctxs = q->queue_hw_ctx
> q->queue_hw_ctx = new_hctxs
> kfree(hctxs)
> movslq %ebx,%rax
> mov (%rdx,%rax,8),%rdi ->uaf
>
Not only uaf on queue_hw_ctx, but also other similar issue on other
structures, and I think the correct and easy fix is to quiesce request
queue during updating nr_hw_queues, something like the following patch:
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index a05ce7725031..d8e7c3cce0dd 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -4467,8 +4467,10 @@ static void __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
if (set->nr_maps == 1 && nr_hw_queues == set->nr_hw_queues)
return;
- list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
+ list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) {
blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
+ blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
+ }
/*
* Switch IO scheduler to 'none', cleaning up the data associated
* with the previous scheduler. We will switch back once we are done
@@ -4518,8 +4520,10 @@ static void __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
blk_mq_elv_switch_back(&head, q);
- list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
+ list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) {
+ blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(q);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
+ }
}
void blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, int nr_hw_queues)
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists