linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 03/13] usb: remove the usage of the list iterator after the loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YheseEX+xD5q1aAd@dev-arch.archlinux-ax161>
Date:   Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:04:08 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jakob <jakobkoschel@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Brian Johannesmeyer <bjohannesmeyer@...il.com>,
        Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
        "Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/13] usb: remove the usage of the list iterator
 after the loop

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 01:53:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 1:46 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, so we should be able to basically convert '--std=gnu89' into
> > > '--std=gnu11 -Wno-shift-negative-value' with no expected change of
> > > behavior.
> >
> > Yes, I think that is correct.
> 
> Ok, somebody please remind me, and let's just try this early in the
> 5.18 merge window.
> 
> Because at least for me, doing
> 
> -                  -std=gnu89
> +                  -std=gnu11 -Wno-shift-negative-value
> 
> for KBUILD_CFLAGS works fine both in my gcc and clang builds. But
> that's obviously just one version of each.

I ran that diff through my set of clang builds on
v5.17-rc5-21-g23d04328444a and only found one issue:

https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1603

I think that should be fixed on the clang side. Once it is, I think we
could just disable that warning in those translation units for older
versions of clang to keep the status quo.

Cheers,
Nathan