[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh87tDvKyuTF+NXBPLrRt=bOszP_N2nf5nkf4knX8SxrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:56:26 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jakob <jakobkoschel@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergman <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Brian Johannesmeyer <bjohannesmeyer@...il.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/13] usb: remove the usage of the list iterator
after the loop
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 2:33 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> So, to follow the proposed solution in this thread, the following change
> is the "correct" one to make, right?
That would indeed be my preference.
If we ever are able to change
list_for_each_entry(tmp, &ep->queue, queue)...
to simply declare 'tmp' as the right type itself, then the e need to do
struct gr_request *tmp;
outside the loop goes away, and this kind of "set a variable that is
declared in the outside context" becomes the only way to do things.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists