linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: sama7g5: Add NAND support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c708f761-aad4-a2f2-9255-01bcb6ad73de@microchip.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:49:30 +0000
From:   <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To:     <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>
CC:     <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: sama7g5: Add NAND support

On 2/24/22 17:04, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 11/01/2022 at 14:05, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>> Add NAND support. The sama7g5's SMC IP is the same as sama5d2's with
>> a slightly change: it provides a synchronous clock output (SMC clock)
>> that is dedicated to FPGA usage. Since this doesn't interfere with the SMC
>> NAND configuration, thus code will not be added in the current nand driver
>> to address the FPGA usage, use the sama5d2's compatible and choose not to
>> introduce dedicated compatibles for sama7g5.
>> Tested with Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAWP NAND flash.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
> 
>> ---
>> The patch depends on the following patch:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20220111125310.902856-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com/T/#u
> 
> Patch seems taken, so I add this one to at91-dt branch for 5.18 merge window.
> 

I think it depends on who gets to next first. If at91 gets before clk,
there will be a build error, isn't it?

Cheers,
ta