linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Fix integrated MSI Receiver mask reg setting during resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YhnvvnPNgDNkTHXO@xhacker>
Date:   Sat, 26 Feb 2022 17:15:42 +0800
From:   Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc:     Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Fix integrated MSI Receiver mask reg setting
 during resume

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 02:08:47PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 12:06:09AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 11:46:22AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 08:02:42PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 03:40:19PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > > > If the host which makes use of the IP's integrated MSI Receiver losts
> > > > > power during suspend, we call dw_pcie_setup_rc() to reinit the RC. But
> > > > > dw_pcie_setup_rc() always set the pp->irq_mask[ctrl] as ~0, so the mask
> > > > > register is always set as 0xffffffff incorrectly, thus the MSI can't
> > > > > work after resume.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fix this issue by moving pp->irq_mask[ctrl] initialization to
> > > > > dw_pcie_host_init(), so we can correctly set the mask reg during both
> > > > > boot and resume.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> > > > 
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > This patch can still be applied to the latest linus tree. Do you want
> > > > me to rebase and send out a new version?
> > > > 
> > > > Without this patch, dwc host MSI interrupt(if use the IP's integrated
> > > > MSI receiver) can't work after resume. Could it be picked up as a fix
> > > > for v5.17?
> > > 
> > > The tricky bit with this patch is that it is not clear what piece of
> > > logic is lost on power down and what not. IIUC MSI interrupt controller
> > > logic is kept so it does not need to be saved/restored (but in
> > 
> > You may mean the external MSI interrupt controller case, but here the
> > focus is the integrated MSI Receiver in the IP. Normally, after
> > suspending to ram, the dwc IP would lost power, so the integrated MSI
> > Receiver also lost power.
> > 
> > > dw_pcie_setup_rc() we overwrite PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE even if it
> > > is not needed on resume - actually, it can even be destructive).
> > > 
> > 
> > For the integrated MSI Receiver case, since the entire IP power is lost,
> > so the PCIE_MSI_INTR0_MASK|ENABLE setting is lost, we need to resume the
> > mask to the one before suspending. For PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE register(s),
> > since it's always 0xffffffff, so current code is fine.
> > 
> > > Maybe we need to write suspend/resume hooks for the dwc core instead
> > > of moving code around to fix these bugs ?
> > > 
> > 
> > Even with suspend/resume hooks, we still need to fix the
> > PCIE_MSI_INTR0_MASK wrong setting with always ~0. After the fix, msi works
> > so we don't need suspend/resume hooks any more.
> 
> I don't understand. The fix removes code that is writing into
> PCIE_MSI_INTR0_MASK (in dw_pcie_setup_rc()). Where that register

No, the patch just moves the irq_mask[] array setting from
dw_pcie_setup_rc() to dw_pcie_host_init(), the code which writes
irq_mask[] array into PCIE_MSI_INTR0_MASK is still kept there.

> content is restored on power up to the correct value then ?

the irq_mask[] array.