[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGS_qxpCH_R9h41r=ycV4aRkXH50mUR5HdODYUF-tTqLbPwuAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 13:22:50 -0800
From: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: tool: more descriptive metavars/--help output
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 8:29 PM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
> > @@ -292,11 +290,11 @@ def add_common_opts(parser) -> None:
> > help='Path to Kconfig fragment that enables KUnit tests.'
> > ' If given a directory, (e.g. lib/kunit), "/.kunitconfig" '
> > 'will get automatically appended.',
> > - metavar='kunitconfig')
> > + metavar='KUNITCONFIG')
>
> Is it worth making this something like FILE or PATH instead.
> PATH_TO_KUNITCONFIG would be verbose, but this is a path being given,
> so just KUNITCONFIG is still a bit useless.
Here's what the complete help output looks like right now:
--kunitconfig KUNITCONFIG
Path to Kconfig fragment that enables KUnit tests. If
given a directory, (e.g. lib/kunit), "/.kunitconfig"
will get automatically appended.
So I didn't think it mattered too much if we left it as-is.
But I like PATH (since users can use a dir, FILE felt potentially
misleading, even if technically correct).
Will send a v2 with the typo in the commit fixed and this changed to PATH.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists