[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yh0XmUtuuyaO9j8j@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 08:42:33 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: 0day robot <lkp@...el.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkp@...ts.01.org, kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] workqueue: Warn flushing of kernel-global workqueues
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 11:03:47PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Then, what about this?
> If this looks OK, I'll test this patch using linux-next via my tree.
Yeah, looks good to me. Can you boot test and fix the obvious ones before
the pushing it to linux-next? It probably would be best if this is kept in a
separate branch together with all the fix-up patches. Once things settle
enough, we should be able to route the patches through the wq tree to Linus.
Thank you so much for doing this.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists