[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220228131614.27ad37dc.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 13:16:14 -0700
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"mgurtovoy@...dia.com" <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>,
"yishaih@...dia.com" <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
liulongfang <liulongfang@...wei.com>,
"Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
"Wangzhou (B)" <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: Add support for VFIO live
migration
On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 14:05:20 -0400
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 06:01:44PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
>
> > +static long hisi_acc_vf_save_unl_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> > + unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > +{
> > + struct hisi_acc_vf_migration_file *migf = filp->private_data;
> > + loff_t *pos = &filp->f_pos;
> > + struct vfio_device_mig_precopy precopy;
> > + unsigned long minsz;
> > +
> > + if (cmd != VFIO_DEVICE_MIG_PRECOPY)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> ENOTTY
>
> > +
> > + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_mig_precopy, dirty_bytes);
> > +
> > + if (copy_from_user(&precopy, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > + if (precopy.argsz < minsz)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&migf->lock);
> > + if (*pos > migf->total_length) {
> > + mutex_unlock(&migf->lock);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + precopy.dirty_bytes = 0;
> > + precopy.initial_bytes = migf->total_length - *pos;
> > + mutex_unlock(&migf->lock);
> > + return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &precopy, minsz) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > +}
>
> Yes
>
> And I noticed this didn't include the ENOMSG handling, read() should
> return ENOMSG when it reaches EOS for the pre-copy:
>
> + * During pre-copy the migration data FD has a temporary "end of stream" that is
> + * reached when both initial_bytes and dirty_byte are zero. For instance, this
> + * may indicate that the device is idle and not currently dirtying any internal
> + * state. When read() is done on this temporary end of stream the kernel driver
> + * should return ENOMSG from read(). Userspace can wait for more data (which may
> + * never come) by using poll.
I'm confused by your previous reply that the use of curr_state should
be eliminated, isn't this ioctl only valid while the device is in the
PRE_COPY or PRE_COPY_P2P states? Otherwise the STOP_COPY state would
have some expectation to be able to use this ioctl for devices
supporting PRE_COPY. I'd like to see the uapi clarify exactly what
states allow this ioctl and define the behavior of the ioctl when
transitioning out of those states with an open data_fd, ie. is it
defined to return an -errno once in STOP_COPY? Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists