linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] hisi_acc_qm: Move PCI device IDs to common header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220228132346.77624e5b.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Feb 2022 13:23:46 -0700
From:   Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, jgg@...dia.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        mgurtovoy@...dia.com, yishaih@...dia.com, linuxarm@...wei.com,
        liulongfang@...wei.com, prime.zeng@...ilicon.com,
        jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, wangzhou1@...ilicon.com,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] hisi_acc_qm: Move PCI device IDs to common
 header

On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 14:12:59 -0600
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:33:38AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > [Cc+ Bjorn, linux-pci]
> > 
> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 09:01:14 +0000
> > Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Move the PCI Device IDs of HiSilicon ACC devices to
> > > a common header and use a uniform naming convention.  
> 
> > > --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> > > @@ -2529,6 +2529,12 @@
> > >  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_KORENIX_JETCARDF3	0x17ff
> > >  
> > >  #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI		0x19e5
> > > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_ZIP_PF	0xa250
> > > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_ZIP_VF	0xa251
> > > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_SEC_PF	0xa255
> > > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_SEC_VF	0xa256
> > > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_HPRE_PF	0xa258
> > > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_HPRE_VF	0xa259  
> 
> We usually don't add things to pci_ids.h unless they're used in more
> than one place (see the comment at the top of the file).  AFAICT,
> these device IDs are only used in one file, so you can leave the
> #defines in the file that uses them or use bare hex values.

Later in this series the VF IDs are added to a vendor variant of the
vfio-pci driver:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220228090121.1903-5-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com/

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8129c3457b3b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
...
+static const struct pci_device_id hisi_acc_vfio_pci_table[] = {
+	{ PCI_DRIVER_OVERRIDE_DEVICE_VFIO(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_SEC_VF) },
+	{ PCI_DRIVER_OVERRIDE_DEVICE_VFIO(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_HPRE_VF) },
+	{ PCI_DRIVER_OVERRIDE_DEVICE_VFIO(PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_HUAWEI_ZIP_VF) },
+	{ }
+};

So I think the VFs IDs meet the requirements, but perhaps not the PF
IDs.  Would it be ok if the PFs were dropped?  Thanks,

Alex