linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: Add support for VFIO live migration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:29:19 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:     Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        "mgurtovoy@...dia.com" <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>,
        "yishaih@...dia.com" <yishaih@...dia.com>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        liulongfang <liulongfang@...wei.com>,
        "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
        "Wangzhou (B)" <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: Add support for VFIO live
 migration

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 01:16:14PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2022 14:05:20 -0400
> Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 06:01:44PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> > 
> > > +static long hisi_acc_vf_save_unl_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> > > +                                      unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct hisi_acc_vf_migration_file *migf = filp->private_data;
> > > +       loff_t *pos = &filp->f_pos;
> > > +       struct vfio_device_mig_precopy precopy;
> > > +       unsigned long minsz;
> > > +
> > > +       if (cmd != VFIO_DEVICE_MIG_PRECOPY)
> > > +               return -EINVAL;  
> > 
> > ENOTTY
> > 
> > > +
> > > +       minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_mig_precopy, dirty_bytes);
> > > +
> > > +       if (copy_from_user(&precopy, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> > > +               return -EFAULT;
> > > +       if (precopy.argsz < minsz)
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +       mutex_lock(&migf->lock);
> > > +       if (*pos > migf->total_length) {
> > > +               mutex_unlock(&migf->lock);
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       precopy.dirty_bytes = 0;
> > > +       precopy.initial_bytes = migf->total_length - *pos;
> > > +       mutex_unlock(&migf->lock);
> > > +       return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &precopy, minsz) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > > +}  
> > 
> > Yes
> > 
> > And I noticed this didn't include the ENOMSG handling, read() should
> > return ENOMSG when it reaches EOS for the pre-copy:
> > 
> > + * During pre-copy the migration data FD has a temporary "end of stream" that is
> > + * reached when both initial_bytes and dirty_byte are zero. For instance, this
> > + * may indicate that the device is idle and not currently dirtying any internal
> > + * state. When read() is done on this temporary end of stream the kernel driver
> > + * should return ENOMSG from read(). Userspace can wait for more data (which may
> > + * never come) by using poll.
> 
> I'm confused by your previous reply that the use of curr_state should
> be eliminated, isn't this ioctl only valid while the device is in the
> PRE_COPY or PRE_COPY_P2P states?  Otherwise the STOP_COPY state would
> have some expectation to be able to use this ioctl for devices
> supporting PRE_COPY.  

I think it is fine to keep working on stop copy, though the
implementation here isn't quite right for that..

if (migf->total_length > QM_MATCH_SIZE)
   precopy.dirty_bytes = migf->total_length - QM_MATCH_SIZE - *pos;
else
   precopy.dity_bytes = 0;

if (*pos < QM_MATCH_SIZE)
    precopy.initial_bytes = QM_MATCH_SIZE - *pos;
else
    precopy.initial_Bytes = 0;

Unless you think we should block it.

> I'd like to see the uapi clarify exactly what states allow this
> ioctl and define the behavior of the ioctl when transitioning out of
> those states with an open data_fd, ie. is it defined to return an
> -errno once in STOP_COPY?  Thanks,

The ioctl is on the data_fd, so it should follow all the normal rules
of the data_fd just like read() - ie all ioctls/read/write fails when
teh state is moved outside one where the data_fd is valid.

That looks like another issue with the above, it doesn't chck
migf->disabled.

Should we add another sentence about this?

Jason