linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 02/10] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for Sunplus SP7021 SoC boards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d6031c8e-5a70-9561-f44e-0573594da34d@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Feb 2022 09:40:29 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     qinjian[覃健] <qinjian@...lus1.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     "mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        "sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>,
        "p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "stefan.wahren@...e.com" <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Wells Lu 呂芳騰 <wells.lu@...plus.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/10] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for
 Sunplus SP7021 SoC boards

On 28/02/2022 08:05, qinjian[覃健] wrote:
> 
>>>> This binding looks incomplete.
>>>
>>> Sunplus SP7021 is an ARM Cortex A7 based SoC.
>>> The patch is for SP7021 SoC and SP7021 based boards.
>>> Sorry, I don't understand your questions.
>>> Could you explain more?
>>
>> You have there only one compatible but if I would expect at least two.
>> One for SoC and one for board. Something like this:
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rda.yaml
>> but in your case enum would have only one entry.
> 
> Currently, we only support one board. Maybe will support more boards in future.

This is not the answer for my questions. I said I expect two compatibles:
1. One for SoC,
2. One for board.

And you respond "we have only one board".

Where is the SoC compatible?

Best regards,
Krzysztof