linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] pin control fixes for the v5.17 series

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4347abab-8bd6-a843-5346-8e28cef46ff3@xs4all.nl>
Date:   Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:01:48 +0100
From:   Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] pin control fixes for the v5.17 series



On 2/28/22 15:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/28/22 06:43, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 9:38 PM Linus Torvalds
>> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 5:11 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> some more pin control fixes that trickled in the last week or
>>>> two.
>>>
>>> Hmm. Am I confused because I thought I'd see a fix for the orangepi
>>> problem that Guenter has been reporting?
>>>
>>> That problem has been pending for quite a while now.
>>
>> OK let's poke Hans, he usually fix things quickly so it must have been missed.
>>
>> Hans did you see Guenthers remark here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220128172003.GA2666058@roeck-us.net/
>>
>> Do you want to attempt patching it or shall I just revert the patch for now?
>>
>> Yours,
>> Linus Walleij
> 
> The fix has long since been submitted and is available in linux-next.
> 
> From my notes:
> 
> Fix posted at
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/0f536cd8-01db-5d16-2cec-ec6d19409a49@xs4all.nl/
> and in linux-next as commit 3c5412cdec9f ("pinctrl-sunxi:
> sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_in/output: use correct offset").
> The fix exposes a lockdep splat for which a fix is posted at
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220216040037.22730-1-samuel@sholland.org/
> This patch is available in linux-next as commit 4649b97042c3 ("pinctrl:
> sunxi: Use unique lockdep classes for IRQs").

Thank you, Guenter, I was just working on a similar reply.

That's my understanding as well.

Regards,

	Hans

> 
> Guenter