[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANgfPd-hZ0Epib2ZoQULhZkY1x4TFn6_wENnbGsiN9sHsHu2+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:06:29 -0800
From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 23/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for a REMOVED leaf SPTE
before making the SPTE
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 4:16 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Explicitly check for a REMOVED leaf SPTE prior to attempting to map
> the final SPTE when handling a TDP MMU fault. Functionally, this is a
> nop as tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic() will eventually detect the frozen SPTE.
> Pre-checking for a REMOVED SPTE is a minor optmization, but the real goal
> is to allow tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic() to have an invariant that the "old"
> SPTE is never a REMOVED SPTE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 4151e61245a7..1acd12bf309f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -1250,7 +1250,11 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> }
> }
>
> - if (iter.level != fault->goal_level) {
> + /*
> + * Force the guest to retry the access if the upper level SPTEs aren't
> + * in place, or if the target leaf SPTE is frozen by another CPU.
> + */
> + if (iter.level != fault->goal_level || is_removed_spte(iter.old_spte)) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return RET_PF_RETRY;
> }
> --
> 2.35.1.574.g5d30c73bfb-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists