Message-ID: <28276890-c90c-e9a9-3cab-15264617ef5a@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 19:21:13 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
        Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow yielding when zapping GFNs
 for defunct TDP MMU root

On 2/26/22 01:15, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 3031b42c27a6..b838cfa984ad 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -91,21 +91,66 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
>   
>   	WARN_ON(!root->tdp_mmu_page);
>   
> -	spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
> -	list_del_rcu(&root->link);
> -	spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
> +	/*
> +	 * Ensure root->role.invalid is read after the refcount reaches zero to
> +	 * avoid zapping the root multiple times, e.g. if a different task
> +	 * acquires a reference (after the root was marked invalid) and puts
> +	 * the last reference, all while holding mmu_lock for read.  Pairs
> +	 * with the smp_mb__before_atomic() below.
> +	 */
> +	smp_mb__after_atomic();
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Free the root if it's already invalid.  Invalid roots must be zapped
> +	 * before their last reference is put, i.e. there's no work to be done,
> +	 * and all roots must be invalidated (see below) before they're freed.
> +	 * Re-zapping invalid roots would put KVM into an infinite loop (again,
> +	 * see below).
> +	 */
> +	if (root->role.invalid) {
> +		spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
> +		list_del_rcu(&root->link);
> +		spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
> +
> +		call_rcu(&root->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Invalidate the root to prevent it from being reused by a vCPU, and
> +	 * so that KVM doesn't re-zap the root when its last reference is put
> +	 * again (see above).
> +	 */
> +	root->role.invalid = true;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Ensure role.invalid is visible if a concurrent reader acquires a
> +	 * reference after the root's refcount is reset.  Pairs with the
> +	 * smp_mb__after_atomic() above.
> +	 */
> +	smp_mb__before_atomic();

I have reviewed the series and I only have very minor comments... but 
this part is beyond me.  The lavish comments don't explain what is an 
optimization and what is a requirement, and after spending quite some 
time I wonder if all this should just be

         if (refcount_dec_not_one(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count))
                 return;

	if (!xchg(&root->role.invalid, true) {
	 	tdp_mmu_zap_root(kvm, root, shared);

		/*
		 * Do not assume the refcount is still 1: because
		 * tdp_mmu_zap_root can yield, a different task
		 * might have grabbed a reference to this root.
		 *
	        if (refcount_dec_not_one(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count))
         	        return;
	}

	/*
	 * The root is invalid, and its reference count has reached
	 * zero.  It must have been zapped either in the "if" above or
	 * by someone else, and we're definitely the last thread to see
	 * it apart from RCU-protected page table walks.
	 */
	refcount_set(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count, 0);

	spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
	list_del_rcu(&root->link);
	spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);

	call_rcu(&root->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);

(Yay for xchg's implicit memory barriers)

Paolo

> +	/*
> +	 * Note, if mmu_lock is held for read this can race with other readers,
> +	 * e.g. they may acquire a reference without seeing the root as invalid,
> +	 * and the refcount may be reset after the root is skipped.  Both races
> +	 * are benign, as flows that must visit all roots, e.g. need to zap
> +	 * SPTEs for correctness, must take mmu_lock for write to block page
> +	 * faults, and the only flow that must not consume an invalid root is
> +	 * allocating a new root for a vCPU, which also takes mmu_lock for write.
> +	 */
> +	refcount_set(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count, 1);
>   
>   	/*
> -	 * A TLB flush is not necessary as KVM performs a local TLB flush when
> -	 * allocating a new root (see kvm_mmu_load()), and when migrating vCPU
> -	 * to a different pCPU.  Note, the local TLB flush on reuse also
> -	 * invalidates any paging-structure-cache entries, i.e. TLB entries for
> -	 * intermediate paging structures, that may be zapped, as such entries
> -	 * are associated with the ASID on both VMX and SVM.
> +	 * Zap the root, then put the refcount "acquired" above.   Recursively
> +	 * call kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root() to test the above logic for avoiding an
> +	 * infinite loop by freeing invalid roots.  By design, the root is
> +	 * reachable while it's being zapped, thus a different task can put its
> +	 * last reference, i.e. flowing through kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root() for a
> +	 * defunct root is unavoidable.
>   	 */
>   	tdp_mmu_zap_root(kvm, root, shared);
> -
> -	call_rcu(&root->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);
> +	kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(kvm, root, shared);
>   }
>   
>   enum tdp_mmu_roots_iter_type {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists