lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 09:33:59 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document
 RZ/V2L SoC

On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 09:32:50PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> Document RZ/V2L CANFD bindings. RZ/V2L CANFD is identical to one found on
> the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible
> string "renesas,rzg2l-canfd" will be used as a fallback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> ---
> DTSI changes [0] have been posted as part of separate series.
> 
> [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/
> 20220227203744.18355-4-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com/
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml          | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

The patch wouldn't apply, but I don't see the problem other than the 
sha hashes are not from a known base. Please send patches against a 
known rcX (rc1 is preferred) unless you have some other dependency. And 
document that dependency.

Anyways, it is applied manually now.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ