linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document RZ/V2L SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 13:57:36 +0000
From:   "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document
 RZ/V2L SoC

Hi Rob,

On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 3:34 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 09:32:50PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > Document RZ/V2L CANFD bindings. RZ/V2L CANFD is identical to one found on
> > the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible
> > string "renesas,rzg2l-canfd" will be used as a fallback.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> > ---
> > DTSI changes [0] have been posted as part of separate series.
> >
> > [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/
> > 20220227203744.18355-4-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com/
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml          | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> The patch wouldn't apply, but I don't see the problem other than the
> sha hashes are not from a known base. Please send patches against a
> known rcX (rc1 is preferred) unless you have some other dependency. And
> document that dependency.
>
Sorry about that, I missed mentioning the depadancy patch [0].

> Anyways, it is applied manually now.
>
Thanks.

[0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20220209163806.18618-5-uli+renesas@fpond.eu/

Cheers,
Prabhakar