linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] tmpfs: support for file creation time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh1oc0=YuMJCnjV_aY4FswtWk3OeO4-SEbCmAXGkAfDPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 11:43:02 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Xavier Roche <xavier.roche@...olia.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tmpfs: support for file creation time

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:43 AM Xavier Roche <xavier.roche@...olia.com> wrote:
>
> Various filesystems (including ext4) now support file creation time.
> This patch adds such support for tmpfs-based filesystems.

What's the odd huge-page noise in this patch?

Other oddities:

    Reply-To: b954973a-b8d1-cab8-63bd-6ea8063de3@...gle.com

WHAT?

And finally - if we really want to treat btime as a first-class entity
and expect things like tmpfs to support it, then we should just bite
the bullet and put it in 'struct inode' along with the other times.

              Linus