[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220302093036.qanm3vxuajinzbwb@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 15:00:36 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, nm@...com,
sboyd@...nel.org, mka@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] OPP: Add support of "opp-microwatt" for advanced
EM registration
On 02-03-22, 08:50, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> If you like, I can introduce new dual-macro implementation
> in energy_modle.h which would sole this issue:
>
> ifdef EM:
> #define EM_SET_ACTIVE_POWER_CB(em_cb, cb) ((em_cb).active_power = cb)
>
> ifndef EM:
> #define EM_SET_ACTIVE_POWER_CB(em_cb, cb) do { } while (0)
>
>
> Then we would keep the single call to the registration EM and
> we would have:
>
> if (_of_has_opp_microwatt_property(dev)) {
> EM_SET_ACTIVE_POWER_CB(em_cb, _get_dt_power);
> goto register_em;
> }
>
>
>
> EM_SET_ACTIVE_POWER_CB(em_cb, _get_power);
>
> register_em:
> ret = em_dev_register_perf_domain(dev, nr_opp, &em_cb, cpus, true);
>
>
> I can do that, please let me know.
That will work as well.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists