[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9f12eb6-9156-022d-1069-662a0af05aaa@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 09:37:37 +0000
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, nm@...com,
sboyd@...nel.org, mka@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] OPP: Add support of "opp-microwatt" for advanced
EM registration
On 3/2/22 09:30, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 02-03-22, 08:50, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> If you like, I can introduce new dual-macro implementation
>> in energy_modle.h which would sole this issue:
>>
>> ifdef EM:
>> #define EM_SET_ACTIVE_POWER_CB(em_cb, cb) ((em_cb).active_power = cb)
>>
>> ifndef EM:
>> #define EM_SET_ACTIVE_POWER_CB(em_cb, cb) do { } while (0)
>>
>>
>> Then we would keep the single call to the registration EM and
>> we would have:
>>
>> if (_of_has_opp_microwatt_property(dev)) {
>> EM_SET_ACTIVE_POWER_CB(em_cb, _get_dt_power);
>> goto register_em;
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> EM_SET_ACTIVE_POWER_CB(em_cb, _get_power);
>>
>> register_em:
>> ret = em_dev_register_perf_domain(dev, nr_opp, &em_cb, cpus, true);
>>
>>
>> I can do that, please let me know.
>
> That will work as well.
>
Great. Thank you for your comments. I'll send v5.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists