[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220302102457.588450-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 12:24:57 +0200
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: mmu: trace kvm_mmu_set_spte after the new SPTE was set
It makes more sense to print new SPTE value than the
old value.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 94f077722b290..0e209f0b2e1d2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -2690,8 +2690,8 @@ static int mmu_set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
if (*sptep == spte) {
ret = RET_PF_SPURIOUS;
} else {
- trace_kvm_mmu_set_spte(level, gfn, sptep);
flush |= mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
+ trace_kvm_mmu_set_spte(level, gfn, sptep);
}
if (wrprot) {
--
2.26.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists