lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 07:18:59 -0500
From:   Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@...k-chips.com>,
        Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] dt-bindings: soc: grf: fix rk3568 usb definitions

On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 3:16 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 01-03-22, 09:52, Peter Geis wrote:
> > Good Morning,
> >
> > Would it be possible to pull this patch individually, to fix the
> > current error reported by Rob?
>
> This does not apply for me on phy-next. What was this based on..?

This is based on linux-next, which the applicable patch was accepted on 24 Feb.
The original patch was correct, but it seems a merge error happened
and these two lines were moved into an incorrect location.
This patch corrects that, but I see on the original patch chain you
are discussing reverting and reapplying to fix it.

>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Peter
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 8:57 AM Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf and rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf
> > > compatibles were incorrectly assigned to the syscon, simple-mfd
> > > enumeration, vice only the syscon enumeration.
> > > This leads a dtbs_check failure.
> > >
> > > Move these to the syscon enumeration.
> > >
> > > Fixes: b3df807e1fb0 ("dt-bindings: soc: grf: add naneng combo phy register compatible")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
> > > index 072318fcd57b..5079e9d24af6 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
> > > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ properties:
> > >        - items:
> > >            - enum:
> > >                - rockchip,rk3288-sgrf
> > > +              - rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf
> > > +              - rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf
> > >                - rockchip,rk3568-usb2phy-grf
> > >                - rockchip,rv1108-usbgrf
> > >            - const: syscon
> > > @@ -39,8 +41,6 @@ properties:
> > >                - rockchip,rk3399-grf
> > >                - rockchip,rk3399-pmugrf
> > >                - rockchip,rk3568-grf
> > > -              - rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf
> > > -              - rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf
> > >                - rockchip,rk3568-pmugrf
> > >                - rockchip,rv1108-grf
> > >                - rockchip,rv1108-pmugrf
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
>
> --
> ~Vinod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists