linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] dt-bindings: soc: grf: fix rk3568 usb definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yh99qVeALFN3X9te@matsya>
Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 19:52:33 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@...k-chips.com>,
        Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] dt-bindings: soc: grf: fix rk3568 usb definitions

On 02-03-22, 07:18, Peter Geis wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 3:16 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 01-03-22, 09:52, Peter Geis wrote:
> > > Good Morning,
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to pull this patch individually, to fix the
> > > current error reported by Rob?
> >
> > This does not apply for me on phy-next. What was this based on..?
> 
> This is based on linux-next, which the applicable patch was accepted on 24 Feb.
> The original patch was correct, but it seems a merge error happened
> and these two lines were moved into an incorrect location.
> This patch corrects that, but I see on the original patch chain you
> are discussing reverting and reapplying to fix it.

Ok let me revert than so that it is easy for everyone to fix up

Thanks

-- 
~Vinod