[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1f82398-3f94-2f48-db92-d1fe487032c7@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 16:58:08 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: shruthi.sanil@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
mgross@...ux.intel.com, srikanth.thokala@...el.com,
lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@...el.com,
mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] clocksource: Add Intel Keem Bay timer support
On 02/03/2022 14:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 10:09:06PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 22/02/2022 10:56, shruthi.sanil@...el.com wrote:
>
>>> + /* Clear interrupt for periodic timer*/
>>
>> nit: comment format is:
>>
>> /*
>> * my comment
>> */
>>
>> One line comment format is usually for the network subsystem
>
> Huh?
> Any pointers to the documentation, please?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst#n598
Well actually it is for multi line, so I may have confused with these
one line comments.
On the other hand having one line comment telling what does the function
right after is not really useful. The function names are self-explanatory.
>>> + keembay_timer_clear_pending_int(tim_base);
>>> + } else {
>>> + /* Disable the timer for one shot timer */
>>
>> comment format
>>
>>> + keembay_timer_disable(tim_base);
>>> + }
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists