linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v8 2/2] clocksource: Add Intel Keem Bay timer support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 16:07:23 +0000
From:   "Sanil, Shruthi" <shruthi.sanil@...el.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" 
        <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "mgross@...ux.intel.com" <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Thokala, Srikanth" <srikanth.thokala@...el.com>,
        "Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi Bai" 
        <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@...el.com>,
        "Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa" 
        <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 2/2] clocksource: Add Intel Keem Bay timer support

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 3:54 PM
> To: Sanil, Shruthi <shruthi.sanil@...el.com>; tglx@...utronix.de;
> robh+dt@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com; mgross@...ux.intel.com; Thokala,
> Srikanth <srikanth.thokala@...el.com>; Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi Bai
> <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@...el.com>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa
> <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] clocksource: Add Intel Keem Bay timer support
> 
> On 02/03/2022 11:12, Sanil, Shruthi wrote:
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> >>> +	if (!(val & TIM_CONFIG_PRESCALER_ENABLE)) {
> >>> +		pr_err("%pOF: Prescaler is not enabled\n", np);
> >>> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> >>> +	}
> >>
> >> Why bail out instead of enabling the prescalar ?
> >
> > Because it is a secure register and it would be updated by the bootloader.
> Should it be considered as a firmware bug ?

No. This is a common driver across products in the series and enablement of this bit depends on the project requirements.
Hence to be sure from driver, we added this check to avoid initialization of the driver in the case where it cannot be functional.

> 
> --
> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> 
> Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-
> blog/> Blog