[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJMZ8PHqJk6drNbNHprmfeV9UvJzJnech7sz_JwcdbckA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 11:04:08 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
"open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>,
Tobias Schramm <t.schramm@...jaro.org>,
Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Revert "dt-bindings: soc: grf: add naneng
combo phy register compatible"
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 8:34 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> This reverts commit b3df807e1fb0 ("dt-bindings: soc: grf: add naneng
> combo phy register compatible") as that was wrongly merged, so better to
> drop the wrong patch
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> ---
> I am applying this to phy-next to fix the issue
Reverting will just cause a different warning that it is undocumented.
The fix in the other thread won't apply either if you revert.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists