[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMdYzYoCeSKPQjUqigtP7GiAB8iDre9BRwVTqvmq_OA-N06NQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 12:12:13 -0500
From: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
"open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>,
Tobias Schramm <t.schramm@...jaro.org>,
Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Revert "dt-bindings: soc: grf: add naneng
combo phy register compatible"
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 12:04 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 8:34 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > This reverts commit b3df807e1fb0 ("dt-bindings: soc: grf: add naneng
> > combo phy register compatible") as that was wrongly merged, so better to
> > drop the wrong patch
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > I am applying this to phy-next to fix the issue
>
> Reverting will just cause a different warning that it is undocumented.
> The fix in the other thread won't apply either if you revert.
Reverting and reapplying the original patch would work.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/patch/20220208091326.12495-2-yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com/
>
> Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists