linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Revert "dt-bindings: soc: grf: add naneng combo phy register compatible"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yh+l7+7zDvI/9e6n@matsya>
Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 22:44:23 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        "open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
        Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>,
        Tobias Schramm <t.schramm@...jaro.org>,
        Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Revert "dt-bindings: soc: grf: add naneng
 combo phy register compatible"

On 02-03-22, 11:04, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 8:34 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > This reverts commit b3df807e1fb0 ("dt-bindings: soc: grf: add naneng
> > combo phy register compatible") as that was wrongly merged, so better to
> > drop the wrong patch
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > I am applying this to phy-next to fix the issue
> 
> Reverting will just cause a different warning that it is undocumented.

Right, but a patch for that would fix that

> The fix in the other thread won't apply either if you revert.

It is not applying for me, so that needs to be updated anyways..

-- 
~Vinod