[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 10:22:59 +0000
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
'Uwe Kleine-König'
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Mateusz Holenko <mholenko@...micro.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Karol Gugala <kgugala@...micro.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Takao Orito <orito.takao@...ionext.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Taichi Sugaya <sugaya.taichi@...ionext.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] serial: make uart_console_write->putchar()'s character
an unsigned char
Hi Maciej,
Le jeu., mars 3 2022 at 09:55:17 +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki
<macro@...am.me.uk> a écrit :
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
>> > The real problem is that using char (or short) for a function
>> parameter
>> > or result is very likely to require the compile add code to mask
>> > the value to 8 (or 16) bits.
>> >
>> > Remember that almost every time you do anything with a signed or
>> unsigned
>> > char/short variable the compiler has to use the integer promotion
>> rules
>> > to convert the value to int.
>> >
>> > You'll almost certainly get better code if the value is left in an
>> > int (or unsigned int) variable until the low 8 bits get written to
>> > a buffer (or hardware register).
>>
>> So should we use int/uint instead of more appropriate shorter types
>> everywhere
>> now? The answer is: definitely not. The assembly on x86 looks good
>> (it uses
>> movz, no ands), RISC architectures have to do what they chose to.
>
> We do have an issue, because we still have this:
>
> void uart_console_write(struct uart_port *port, const char *s,
> unsigned int count,
> void (*putchar)(struct uart_port *, int))
>
> and then:
>
> putchar(port, *s);
>
> there. Consequently on targets where plain `char' type is signed the
> value retrieved from `*s' has to be truncated in the call to
> `putchar'.
> And indeed it happens with the MIPS target:
>
> 803ae47c: 82050000 lb a1,0(s0)
> 803ae480: 26100001 addiu s0,s0,1
> 803ae484: 02402025 move a0,s2
> 803ae488: 0220f809 jalr s1
> 803ae48c: 30a500ff andi a1,a1,0xff
>
> vs current code:
>
> 803ae47c: 82050000 lb a1,0(s0)
> 803ae480: 26100001 addiu s0,s0,1
> 803ae484: 0220f809 jalr s1
> 803ae488: 02402025 move a0,s2
And how is that at all a problem?
> (NB the last instruction shown after the call instruction, JALR, is
> in the
> delay slot that is executed before the PC gets updated). Now
> arguably the
> compiler might notice that and use an unsigned LBU load instruction
> rather
> than the signed LB load instruction, which would make the ANDI
> instruction
> redundant, but still I think we ought to avoid gratuitous type
> signedness
> changes.
>
> So I'd recommend changing `s' here to `const unsigned char *' or, as
> I
> previously suggested, maybe to `const u8 *' even.
Just cast the string to "const u8 *" within the function, while keeping
a "const char *s" argument. The compiler will then most likely generate
LBUs.
Cheers,
-Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists