lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 3 Mar 2022 10:23:40 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     "'Maciej W. Rozycki'" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
CC:     'Uwe Kleine-König' 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Mateusz Holenko <mholenko@...micro.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
        Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        "Paul Mackerras" <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "Michal Simek" <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Karol Gugala <kgugala@...micro.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "Alexander Shiyan" <shc_work@...l.ru>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        "Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        "bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com" 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>,
        Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>,
        "Albert Ou" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Takao Orito <orito.takao@...ionext.com>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        "Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Taichi Sugaya <sugaya.taichi@...ionext.com>,
        "Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] serial: make uart_console_write->putchar()'s character
 an unsigned char

From: Maciej W. Rozycki
> Sent: 03 March 2022 09:55
> 
> > > The real problem is that using char (or short) for a function parameter
> > > or result is very likely to require the compile add code to mask
> > > the value to 8 (or 16) bits.
> > >
> > > Remember that almost every time you do anything with a signed or unsigned
> > > char/short variable the compiler has to use the integer promotion rules
> > > to convert the value to int.
> > >
> > > You'll almost certainly get better code if the value is left in an
> > > int (or unsigned int) variable until the low 8 bits get written to
> > > a buffer (or hardware register).
> >
> > So should we use int/uint instead of more appropriate shorter types everywhere
> > now? The answer is: definitely not. The assembly on x86 looks good (it uses
> > movz, no ands), RISC architectures have to do what they chose to.
> 
>  We do have an issue, because we still have this:
> 
> void uart_console_write(struct uart_port *port, const char *s,
> 			unsigned int count,
> 			void (*putchar)(struct uart_port *, int))
> 
> and then:
> 
> 		putchar(port, *s);
> 
> there.  Consequently on targets where plain `char' type is signed the
> value retrieved from `*s' has to be truncated in the call to `putchar'.
> And indeed it happens with the MIPS target:
> 
> 803ae47c:	82050000 	lb	a1,0(s0)
> 803ae480:	26100001 	addiu	s0,s0,1
> 803ae484:	02402025 	move	a0,s2
> 803ae488:	0220f809 	jalr	s1
> 803ae48c:	30a500ff 	andi	a1,a1,0xff
> 
> vs current code:
> 
> 803ae47c:	82050000 	lb	a1,0(s0)
> 803ae480:	26100001 	addiu	s0,s0,1
> 803ae484:	0220f809 	jalr	s1
> 803ae488:	02402025 	move	a0,s2
> 
> (NB the last instruction shown after the call instruction, JALR, is in the
> delay slot that is executed before the PC gets updated).  Now arguably the
> compiler might notice that and use an unsigned LBU load instruction rather
> than the signed LB load instruction, which would make the ANDI instruction
> redundant, but still I think we ought to avoid gratuitous type signedness
> changes.
> 
>  So I'd recommend changing `s' here to `const unsigned char *' or, as I
> previously suggested, maybe to `const u8 *' even.

Or just not worry that the 'char' value (either [128..127] or [0..255])
is held in a 'signed int' variable.
That basically happens every time it is loaded into a register anyway.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ