[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YiCaSSbbszm3qYIQ@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:36:57 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tyrone Ting <warp5tw@...il.com>
Cc: avifishman70@...il.com, tmaimon77@...il.com, tali.perry1@...il.com,
venture@...gle.com, yuenn@...gle.com, benjaminfair@...gle.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com,
yangyicong@...ilicon.com, semen.protsenko@...aro.org,
wsa@...nel.org, jie.deng@...el.com, sven@...npeter.dev,
bence98@....bme.hu, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, arnd@...db.de,
olof@...om.net, tali.perry@...oton.com, Avi.Fishman@...oton.com,
tomer.maimon@...oton.com, KWLIU@...oton.com, JJLIU0@...oton.com,
kfting@...oton.com, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] i2c: npcm: Handle spurious interrupts
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:31:39PM +0800, Tyrone Ting wrote:
> From: Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>
>
> In order to better handle spurious interrupts:
> 1. Disable incoming interrupts in master only mode.
> 2. Clear end of busy (EOB) after every interrupt.
> 3. Return correct status during interrupt.
This is bad commit message, it doesn't explain "why" you are doing these.
...
> + /*
> + * if irq is not one of the above, make sure EOB is disabled and all
> + * status bits are cleared.
This does not explain why you hide the spurious interrupt.
> + */
> + if (ret == IRQ_NONE) {
> + npcm_i2c_eob_int(bus, false);
> + npcm_i2c_clear_master_status(bus);
> + }
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists