[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875yothc8l.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 10:13:46 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
longman@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
Leah Leshchinsky <lleshchi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/locking/locktypes: Fix PREEMPT_RT _bh()
description
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com> writes:
> With PREEMPT_RT the _bh() version of a spinlock leaves preemption
> enabled, align the doc to say that instead of the opposite.
>
> Reported-by: Leah Leshchinsky <lleshchi@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
> ---
> Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst b/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
> index 4fd7b70fcde1..bfa75ea1b66a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ based on rt_mutex which changes the semantics:
> Non-PREEMPT_RT kernels disable preemption to get this effect.
>
> PREEMPT_RT kernels use a per-CPU lock for serialization which keeps
> - preemption disabled. The lock disables softirq handlers and also
> + preemption enabled. The lock disables softirq handlers and also
> prevents reentrancy due to task preemption.
Applied, thanks.
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists