[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220304194853.GN11184@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 20:48:53 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, joao@...rdrivepizza.com, hjl.tools@...il.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, mark.rutland@....com,
alyssa.milburn@...el.com, mbenes@...e.cz, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/39] x86/ibt,ftrace: Make function-graph play nice
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 09:51:54AM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 12:23:39PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > +
> > + addq $16, %rsp
> > + ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL
> > + call .Ldo_rop
> > + int3
> > +.Ldo_rop:
> > + mov %rdi, (%rsp)
> > + UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
> > + RET
>
> Why the int3?
Speculation trap :-) Either I'm too paranoid or not paranoid enough; but
without it it's just too close to a retpoline and it doesn't feel right.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists