[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220304202225.GO11184@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 21:22:25 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, joao@...rdrivepizza.com, hjl.tools@...il.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, mark.rutland@....com,
alyssa.milburn@...el.com, mbenes@...e.cz, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/39] x86: Kernel IBT
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:09:58AM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> I'm getting some warnings with CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT=n:
>
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.o: warning: objtool: irq_entries_start()+0x7: unreachable instruction
> arch/x86/kernel/ftrace_64.o: warning: objtool: return_to_handler()+0x2a: unreachable instruction
Urgh, lemme go chase that.
> And a warning with CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT=y:
>
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: .text+0xaf0: unreachable instruction
This is that weak symbol issue :/ We talked about it on IRC, but i've
not yet come around to fixing it.
This is mostly a pre-existing issue, only uncovered because we run on
vmlinux more..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists