[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6055c4a-b32f-8025-f096-f6abda03e2d4@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:24:31 +0800
From: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@...wei.com>
To: Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>,
Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>, Chris Leech <cleech@...hat.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<open-iscsi@...glegroups.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Wu Bo <wubo40@...wei.com>, Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>,
<linfeilong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iscsi_tcp: Check if tcp_conn is valid in
On 2022/3/3 22:59, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 3/3/22 8:56 PM, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>> iscsi_create_conn() would add newly alloced iscsi_cls_conn to connlist,
>> it means when userspace sends ISCSI_UEVENT_SET_PARAM, iscsi_conn_lookup()
>> would found this iscsi_cls_conn and call the set_param callback which is
>> iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_set_param(). While the iscsi_conn's dd_data might not
>> been initialized.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <wubo40@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c b/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
>> index 14db224486be..a42449df6156 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
>> @@ -716,13 +716,17 @@ static int iscsi_sw_tcp_conn_set_param(struct iscsi_cls_conn *cls_conn,
>> {
>> struct iscsi_conn *conn = cls_conn->dd_data;
>> struct iscsi_tcp_conn *tcp_conn = conn->dd_data;
>> - struct iscsi_sw_tcp_conn *tcp_sw_conn = tcp_conn->dd_data;
>> + struct iscsi_sw_tcp_conn *tcp_sw_conn;
>>
>> switch(param) {
>> case ISCSI_PARAM_HDRDGST_EN:
>> iscsi_set_param(cls_conn, param, buf, buflen);
>> break;
>> case ISCSI_PARAM_DATADGST_EN:
>> + if (!tcp_conn || !tcp_conn->dd_data)
>> + return -ENOTCONN;
>> +
>> + tcp_sw_conn = tcp_conn->dd_data;
>> iscsi_set_param(cls_conn, param, buf, buflen);
>> tcp_sw_conn->sendpage = conn->datadgst_en ?
>> sock_no_sendpage : tcp_sw_conn->sock->ops->sendpage;
>
> Is this something you hit or from code review?
>
It's from code review. I reviewed the code because the panic mentioned
in my first patch. The issue seems would not happen, so just ignore it.
> We have those state checks:
>
> if ((conn->state == ISCSI_CONN_BOUND) ||
> (conn->state == ISCSI_CONN_UP)) {
> err = transport->set_param(conn, ev->u.set_param.param,
>
> so we don't call set_param until after we have bound the
> connection which will be after ISCSI_UEVENT_CREATE_CONN has returned.
>
> Also for this specific bug iscsi_if_recv_msg is called with the
> rx_queue_mutex, so set_param can only be called after the
> ISCSI_UEVENT_CREATE_CONN cmd has returned.
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists