[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220304142606.3yxwah4k36deqa3e@soft-dev3-1.localhost>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 15:26:06 +0100
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix interrupt parsing
The 03/04/2022 14:41, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 02:40:38PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 09:37:16PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > > In the blamed commit, it removes the duplicate of_node assignment in the
> > > driver. But the driver uses this before calling into of_gpio_dev_init to
> > > determine if it needs to assign an IRQ chip to the GPIO. The fixes
> > > consists in using of_node from dev.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > - irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(gc->of_node, 0);
> > > + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(info->dev->of_node, 0);
> >
> > Why platform_get_irq() can't be used?
>
> Or actually _optional() variant of it?
It can be used. I will update this in the next series.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
--
/Horatiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists