linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Add support for 1588 in LAN8814

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220304.143730.2194933898132251429.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 04 Mar 2022 14:37:30 +0000 (GMT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     andrew@...n.ch
Cc:     Divya.Koppera@...rochip.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, kuba@...nel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        richardcochran@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, madhuri.sripada@...rochip.com,
        manohar.puri@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Add support for 1588 in LAN8814

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 14:47:48 +0100

> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 01:21:21PM +0000, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 14:06:54 +0100
>> 
>> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 12:50:11PM +0000, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org wrote:
>> >> Hello:
>> >> 
>> >> This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
>> >> by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
>> > 
>> > Hi David
>> > 
>> > Why was this merged?
>> 
>> Sorry, it seemed satraightforward to me, and I try to get the backlog under 40 patches before
>> I hand over to Jakub for the day.
>> 
>> If you want to review, reply to the thread immediately saying so, don't wait until you haver time for the
>> full review.
> 
> This patchset was on the list for less than 5 hours before it got
> merged. I tend to sleep for 8 to 10 hours. Making it impossible for me
> to react any faster. At an absolute minimum, you need to wait 12
> hours, if you expect anybody to have a fair chance of being able to
> say, hold on, i want to comment on this patchset.
> 
> I also don't like the metric of 40 patches backlog. Is the size of
> backlog more important than the quality of the patches? Don't we care
> about the quality of the code any more? Don't we care about getting
> code reviewed any more?

Ok, message received, I'll apply things less aggressively.

Thank you.