lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220304154239.GA13902@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date:   Fri, 4 Mar 2022 07:42:39 -0800
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Divya.Koppera@...rochip.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, hkallweit1@...il.com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, kuba@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, madhuri.sripada@...rochip.com,
        manohar.puri@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Add support for 1588 in LAN8814

On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 03:17:19PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:

> My perception is that you also like to sleep at nights, and cannot
> keep up with David rapid pace. So setting up your own tree, collecting
> reviews and acks yourself will help you and the quality of the PTP
> code. So yes, go for it.  I just think it is wrong you have to do
> this.

I agree that PTP drivers are being merged too quickly without enough
review, and my commitment to maintaining a PTP tree will both allow
better review and reduce davem's burden.

So maybe it is right for me to do this after all.

Thanks,
Richard




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ