lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat,  5 Mar 2022 09:15:10 +0800
From:   Bang Li <libang.linuxer@...il.com>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     urezki@...il.com, lpf.vector@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, libang.linuxer@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: fix comments about vmap_area struct

the vmap_area_root should be in the "busy" tree and the free_vmap_area_root
should be in the "free" tree.

Fixes: 688fcbfc06e4 ("mm/vmalloc: modify struct vmap_area to reduce its size")
Signed-off-by: Bang Li <libang.linuxer@...il.com>
---
 include/linux/vmalloc.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
index 880227b9f044..05065915edd7 100644
--- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
+++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
@@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ struct vmap_area {
 	/*
 	 * The following two variables can be packed, because
 	 * a vmap_area object can be either:
-	 *    1) in "free" tree (root is vmap_area_root)
-	 *    2) or "busy" tree (root is free_vmap_area_root)
+	 *    1) in "free" tree (root is free_vmap_area_root)
+	 *    2) or "busy" tree (root is vmap_area_root)
 	 */
 	union {
 		unsigned long subtree_max_size; /* in "free" tree */
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ